Sharing Business Data Securely Insights from the European Gaia-X Project on Technical and Economic Roles Enabling Federated Data Spaces

Main Article Content

Christoph Heinbach https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1602-5192
Jens Gessler https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5265-0086
Hanspeter Rychlik https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0326-6691
Christine Stecenko https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0423-224X
Horst Wieker
Wolfgang H. Schulz https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7746-4303

Keywords

Data sharing, federated data space, organisational role, Gaia-X, digital federation

Abstract

Federated data spaces (FDSs) represent an innovative approach to foster sovereign and interoperable data sharing across various business domains, promising substantial opportunities for value creation. The European Gaia-X initiative has emerged as a key driver in promoting FDS developments, particularly through its emphasis on data sovereignty and collaborative innovation. Effective design and operation of FDSs require a wide array of skills, expertise, services and technological components, creating a complex landscape for participating organisations. In this paper, we explore the technical and economic roles necessary for the successful implementation of FDSs, focusing on insights derived from two mobility use cases. Through interviews with experts engaged in a Gaia-X project, we identify 39 distinct roles, which we further abstract into eight meta-roles. These roles illustrate the structure and dynamics of inter-organisational collaboration in FDSs. Our analysis contributes to existing knowledge by illuminating the inter-organisational networks in FDSs, with a specific focus on the roles that support technical integration and economic value generation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 39 | 1037-PDF-v12n4pp66-84 Downloads 2

References

Atzori, M., Ciaramella, A., Diamantini, C., Martino, B., Distefano, S., Facchinetti, T., Montecchiani, F., Nocera, A., Ruffo, G., Trasarti, R. (2024). Dataspaces: Concepts, architectures and initiatives. CEUR workshop proceedings, 3606. CEUR-WS.org. https://hdl.handle.net/11584/389724
Autolitano, S., & Pawlowska, A. (2021). Europe’s quest for digital sovereignty: GAIA-X as a case study. Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI). [PDF] https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iaip2114.pdf
Beverungen, D., Hess, T., Köster, A., & Lehrer, C. (2022). From private digital platforms to public data spaces: Implications for the digital transformation. Electronic Markets, 32(2), 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00553-z
Biddle, B. J. (1979). Role theory: Expectations, identities, and behaviors. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169938202500214
BMWi (2019). Project GAIA-X – A Federated Data Infrastructure as the Cradle of a Vibrant European Ecosystem. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi). https://www.bmwk.de/Redaktion/EN/Publikationen/Digitale-Welt/project-gaia-x.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1 (Retrieved on 13 November 2024)
Braud, A., Fromentoux, G., Radier, B., & Le Grand, O. (2021). The road to European digital sovereignty with Gaia-X and IDSA. IEEE Network, 35(2), 4–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2021.9387709
Catena-X Automotive Network e.V. (2024). Radical change calls for even more radical collaboration. https://catena-x.net/en/ (Retrieved on 11 November 2024)
Cennamo, C. (2021). Competing in digital markets: A platform-based perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35(2), 265–291. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2016.0048
Curry, E., Tuikka, T., Metzger, A., Zillner, S., Bertels, N., Ducuing, C., Dalle Carbonare, D., Gusmeroli, S., Scerri, S., López de Vallejo, I., & García Robles, A. (2022). Data sharing spaces: The BDVA perspective. In B. Otto, M. Ten Hompel, & S. Wrobel (Eds.), Designing Data Spaces (pp. 365–382). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93975-5_22
de Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., & Basole, R. C. (2018). The digital platform: A research agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 33(2), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-016-0033-3
DiMOS Operations GmbH (2024). Gaia-X 4 ROMS: Support and Remote-Operation of Automated and Networked Mobility Services. https://www.gaia-x4futuremobility.de/en/projects/roms (Retrieved on 13 November 2024)
DRM Datenraum Mobilität GmbH (2024). Mobility Data Space: The data space for future mobility. https://mobility-dataspace.eu/ (Retrieved on 13 November 2024)
Eclipse Foundation AISBL (2024). Dataspaces and the Eclipse Dataspace Components (EDC). https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.edc (Retrieved on 13 Novem¬ber 2024)
Eggers, G., Fondermann, B., Maier, B., Ottradovetz, K., Pfrommer, J., Reinhardt, R., Rollin, H., Schmieg, A., Steinbuß, S., Trinius, P., Weiss, A., Weiss, C., & Wilfling, S. (2020). GAIA-X: Technical Architecture. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi). https://www.bmwk.de/Redaktion/EN/Publikationen/gaia-x-technical-architecture.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1 (Retrieved on 13 November 2024)
European Commission (2024). SME Definition. https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/smes/sme-fundamentals/sme-definition_en (Retrieved on 13 November 2024)
Franklin, M., Halevy, A., & Maier, D. (2005). From databases to dataspaces: A new abstraction for information management. ACM SIGMOD Record, 34(4), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/1107499.1107502
Gaia-X European Association for Data and Cloud AISBL (2021). Gaia-X Federation Services (GXFS). https://gaia-x.eu/wp-content/uploads/files/2022-01/Gaia-X_Federation_Services_White_Paper_1_December_2021.pdf (Retrieved on 11 November 2024)
Gaia-X European Association for Data and Cloud AISBL (2022). Gaia-X – Architecture Document – 22.04 Release. https://gaia-x.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Gaia-x-Architecture-Document-22.04-Release.pdf (Retrieved on 11 November 2024)
Gaia-X European Association for Data and Cloud AISBL (2024). Gaia-X: European Association for Data and Cloud AISBL. https://gaia-x.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Gaia-X-Brochure_2024_Online_Spread.pdf (Retrieved on 11 November 2024)
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction.
Golshanara, L., & Chomicki, J. (2020). Temporal data exchange. Information Systems, 87, 101414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2019.07.004
Heinbach, C., Beinke, J., Kammler, F., & Thomas, O. (2022). Data-driven forwarding: A typology of digital platforms for road freight transport management. Electronic Markets, 32(2), 807–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00540-4
Heinbach, C., Gösling, H., Meier, P. & Thomas, O. (2023). Smart managed freight fleet: Ein automatisiertes und vernetztes Flottenmanagement in einem föderierten Datenökosystem. HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 60(1), 193–213. https://doi.org/10.1365/s40702-022-00887-4
Huber, M., Wessel, S., Brost, G., & Menz, N. (2022). Building trust in data spaces. In B. Otto, M. Ten Hompel, & S. Wrobel (Eds.), Designing Data Spaces (pp. 147–164). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93975-5_9
Hummel, P., Braun, M., Tretter, M., & Dabrock, P. (2021). Data sovereignty: A review. Big Data & Society, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720982012
Hutterer, A., & Krumay, B. (2022). Integrating Heterogeneous data in dataspaces – a systematic mapping study. Proceedings of Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS) 2022. 222. https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2022/222
Hutterer, A., & Krumay, B. (2024). The adoption of data spaces: Drivers toward federated data sharing. Proceedings of the 57th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) 2024 (pp. 4506–4515). https://hdl.handle.net/10125/106926
Hutterer, A., Krumay, B. & Mühlburger, M. (2023). What constitutes a dataspace? Conceptual clarity beyond technical aspects. In Proceedings of 29th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) 2023. 5. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2023/eco_systems/eco_systems/5
Jussen, I., Schweihoff, J., Dahms, V., Möller, F., & Otto, B. (2023). Data sharing fundamentals: Definition and characteristics. Proceedings of the 56th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) 2023 (pp. 3685–3694). https://hdl.handle.net/10125/103083
Kagermann, H., Streibich, K.-H., & Suder, K. (2021). Digital sovereignty. Status quo and perspectives. acatech IMPULSE– National Academy of Science and Engineering. https://en.acatech.de/publication/digital-sovereignty/ (Retrieved on 13 November 2024)
Knight, L., & Harland, C. (2005). Managing supply networks: Organizational roles in network management. European Management Journal, 23(3), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2005.04.006
Lee, S. U., Zhu, L., & Jeffery, R. (2019). Data governance decisions for platform cosystems. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) 2019 (pp. 6377–6386). https://hdl.handle.net/10125/60072
Lindman, J., Kinnari, T., & Rossi, M. (2016). Business roles in the emerging open-data ecosystem. IEEE Software, 33(5), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2015.25
Maecker, D., Gösling, H., Heinbach, C., & Kammler, F. (2023). Exploring multi-agent systems for intermodal freight fleets: Literature-based justification of a new concept. Proceedings of the 18 Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2023) (pp. 1–17). https://aisel.aisnet.org/wi2023/97
Maghazei, O., Lewis, M. A., & Netland, T. H. (2022). Emerging technologies and the use case: A multi‐year study of drone adoption. Journal of Operations Management, 68(6–7), 560–591. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1196
Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. Harper & Row.
Mosch, P., Majocco, P., & Obermaier, R. (2023). Contrasting value creation strategies of industrial-IoT-platforms – a multiple case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 263, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108937
Möller, F., Jussen, I., Springer, V., Gieß, A., Schweihoff, J. C., Gelhaar, J., Guggenberger, T., & Otto, B. (2024). Industrial data ecosystems and data spaces. Electronic Markets, 34(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-024-00724-0
Nagel, L., & Lycklama, D. (2022). How to build, run, and govern data spaces. In B. Otto, M. Ten Hompel, & S. Wrobel (Eds.), Designing Data Spaces (p. 17–28). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93975-5_2
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
Otto, B. (2022a). A federated infrastructure for European data spaces. Communications of the ACM, 65(4), 44–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/3512341
Otto, B. (2022b). The evolution of data spaces. In B. Otto, M. Ten Hompel, & S. Wrobel (Eds.), Designing Data Spaces. (p. 3–15). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93975-5_1
Otto, B., & Jarke, M. (2019). Designing a multi-sided data platform: Findings from the international data spaces case. Electronic Markets, 29(4), 561–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00362-x
Otto, B., Ten Hompel, M., & Wrobel, S. (2022). Preface. In B. Otto, M. Ten Hompel, & S. Wrobel (Eds.), Designing Data Spaces. (pp. vi–viii). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93975-5
Papert, M., & Pflaum, A. (2017). Development of an ecosystem model for the realization of Internet of Things (IoT) services in supply chain management. Electronic Markets, 27(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-017-0251-8
Parker, G., Van Alstyne, M., & Jiang, X. (2017). Platform cosystems: How developers invert the firm. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.13
Pettenpohl, H., Spiekermann, M., & Both, J. R. (2022). International data spaces in a nutshell. In B. Otto, M. Ten Hompel, & S. Wrobel (Eds.), Designing Data Spaces (pp. 29–40). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93975-5_3
Reiberg, A., Niebel, C., & Kraemer, P. (2022). What Is a Data Space? [White paper]. Gaia-X Hub Germany. https://gaia-x-hub.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/GX-White-Paper-Data-Space.pdf (Retrieved on 15 November 2024)
Schleimer, A. M., Jahnke, N., & Otto, B. (2023). Architecture design options for federated data spaces. Proceedings of the 56th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) 2023 (pp. 3643–3652). https://hdl.handle.net/10125/103078
Schulz, W. H. & Franck, O. (2022). The institutional role model: A system-dynamic approach to reduce complexity. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 17(2), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.170201
Schulz, W. H., Franck, O., & Smolka, S. (2021). Die Theorie der institutionellen Rollenmodelle – der Restrukturierungsansatz für Unternehmen zur Bewältigung der COVID-19 Krise. In W. H. Schulz, N. Joisten, & C. F. Edye (Eds.), Mobilität nach COVID-19 (pp. 1–32). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33308-9_1
Schulz, W. H., Joisten, N., & Arnegger, B. (2019). Development of the institutional role model as a contribution to the implementation of co-operative transport systems. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3421107
Senyo, P. K., Liu, K., & Effah, J. (2019). Digital business ecosystem: Literature review and a framework for future research. International Journal of Information Management, 47, 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.002
Solmaz, G., Cirillo, F., Fürst, J., Jacobs, T., Bauer, M., Kovacs, E., Santana, J. R., & Sánchez, L. (2022). Enabling data spaces: Existing developments and challenges. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Data Economy 2022 (pp. 42–48). https://doi.org/10.1145/3565011.3569058
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage publications.
Tubre, T. C., & Collins, J. M. (2000). Jackson and Schuler (1985) revisited: A meta-analysis of the relationships between role ambiguity, role conflict, and job performance. Journal of Management, 26(1), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600104
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Research commentary – The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724–735. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0322