Analysing the Effects of Paid Subscriptions on User Engagement in Social Media Platforms A Sentiment Analysis Approach
Main Article Content
Keywords
Paid Subscriptions, User Engagement, Revenue Growth, Social Media, Sentiment Analysis
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of paid subscriptions on revenue and user engagement on social media platforms, focusing on Instagram. By leveraging Network Externality Theory, Customer Engagement Theory, and Uses and Gratifications Theory, the research explores how paid subscriptions impact network effects, user base growth, and emotional and behavioural engagement. A longitudinal analysis of 146,942 Instagram comments reveals a predominantly positive sentiment towards paid subscriptions, with users expressing high levels of appreciation and satisfaction. The study identifies key themes such as positive engagement, content quality and constructive feedback. Findings suggest that paid subscriptions enhance platform attractiveness and user interaction, driving increased engagement and revenue growth. This research provides valuable insights for platform developers and content creators, highlighting the importance of continuous monitoring and responsiveness to user feedback.
References
Afuah, A. (2013). Are network effects all about size? The role of structure and conduct. Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), 257–273. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23362656
Alhabash, S., & Ma, M. (2017). A tale of four platforms: Motivations and uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat among college students. Social Media + Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117691544
Anderson, E. G., Parker, G., & Tan, B. (2023). Strategic Investments for Platform Launch and Ecosystem Growth: A Dynamic Analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 40(3), 807–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2023.2229125
Berelson, B. (1959). The state of communication research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 23(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1086/266840
Beyari, H., & Hashem, T. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence in personalizing social media marketing strategies for enhanced customer experience. Behavioural Sciences, 15(5), 700. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050700
Brodie, R. J., Hollebeek, L. D., Juric, B., & Ilic, A. (2011). Customer Engagement: Conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research in service marketing. Journal of Service Research, 14(3), 252–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670511411703
Chen, Y. S., Lin, C. K., Chuang, H. M., & Cheng, M. C. (2017). Design of a hybrid model for dynamic engagement behaviour analysis in a cloud-based environment. International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, 25(1–2), 85–85. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijahuc.2017.083491
Dessart, L., Veloutsou, C., & Morgan-Thomas, A. (2015). Consumer engagement in online brand communities: A social media perspective. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 24(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-06-2014-0635
Hagiu, A., & Wright, J. (2015). Multi-sided platforms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 43, 162–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2015.03.003
Hermida, A., Fletcher, F., Korell, D., & Logan, D. (2012). Share, like, recommend: Decoding the social media news consumer. Journalism Studies, 13(5-6), 815–824. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315678962
Hossain, M. Z., & Kibria, H. (2024). Exploring the evolution of brand loyalty in the age of social media. Journal of Service Science and Management, 17(03), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2024.173011
Jhang‐Li, J., & Liou, J. (2023). An analysis of operating strategy for a video live streaming platform: advertisement, advertorial, and donation. Information Technology and Management, 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-023-00387-x
Katz, E. (1959). Mass communications research and the study of popular culture: An editorial note on a possible future for this journal. Studies in Public Communication, 2, 1–6. https://repository.upenn.edu/handle/20.500.14332/1803
Kim, Y., & Kim, B. (2020). Selection attributes of innovative digital platform-based subscription services: A case of South Korea. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity, 6(3), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6030070
Kiss, Á., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Identifying the bandwagon effect in two-round elections. Public Choice, 160, 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-013-0146-y
Lin, H., Fan, W., & Wallace, L. (2013). The effects of social and technical factors on user satisfaction, sense of belonging and knowledge community usage. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 9(3), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.4018/jec.2013070102
Manago, A. M. (2015). Media and the development of identity. In R. A. Scott & S.M. Kosslyn (Eds), Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioural Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0212
Park, D., & Lee, S. (2021). UGC sharing motives and their effects on UGC sharing intention from quantitative and qualitative perspectives: Focusing on content creators in South Korea. Sustainability, 13(17), 9644. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179644
Quan-Haase, A., & Young, A. I. (2010). Uses and gratifications of Social Media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 350–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610380009
Riaz, S., Aksar, I. A., & Pasha, S. A. (2016). Social media and women: A gratification analysis. The Women-Annual Research Journal of Gender Studies, 8(8). Available at https://sujo.usindh.edu.pk/index.php/THE-WOMEN/article/view/617
Rohlfs, J. (1974). A theory of interdependent demand for a communications service. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 5(1), 16–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003090
Shane-Simpson, C., Manago, A., Gaggi, N., & Gillespie-Lynch, K. (2018). Why do college students prefer Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram? Site affordances, tensions between privacy and self-expression, and implications for social capital. Computers in Human Behaviour, 86, 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.041
Sichach, M. (2023, November 17). Uses and Gratifications theory — Background, History and Limitations. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4729248
Stafford, T. F., Stafford, M. R., & Schkade, L. L. (2004). Determining uses and gratifications for the Internet. Decision sciences, 35(2), 259–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.00117315.2004.02524.x
Sundar, S. S., & Limperos, A. M. (2013). Uses and Grats 2.0: New gratifications for new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(4), 504–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2013.845827
Suzianti, A., Avianto, L. H. D., & Larasati, N. A. (2019). User engagement analysis on mobile application Starbucks ID study case. ICCIP 2019: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Communication and Information Processing. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369985.3370006
Vivek, S. D., Beatty, S. E., & Morgan, R. M. (2012). Customer engagement: Exploring customer relationships beyond purchase. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 20(2), 122–146. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679200201
Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: A uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(4), 362–369. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2013-0041
