Software Defined Networking – Shaping up for the next disruptive step?

Main Article Content

Doan Hoang

Keywords

Software-Defined Networks, Network Virtualisation, Network Management, Disruptive Technology

Abstract

Software-Defined Networking (SDN) has emerged as a networking paradigm that can remove the limitations of current network infrastructures by separating the control plane from the data forwarding plane. As an immediate result, networks can be managed cost effectively and autonomously through centralising the decision-making capability at the control plane and the programmability of network devices on the data plane. This allows the two planes to evolve independently and open up separate horizontal markets on simplified network devices and programmable controllers.  More importantly, it opens up markets for infrastructure providers to provision and offer network resources on-demand to multiple tenants and for service providers to develop and deploy their services on shared infrastructure resources cost-effectively. This paper provides an essential understanding of the SDN concept and architecture. It discusses the important implications of the control/data plane separation on network devices, management and applications beyond the scope of the original SDN. It also discusses two major issues that may help to bring the disruptive technology forward: the intent northbound interface and the cost-effective SDN approaches for the industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Abstract 581 | PDF Downloads 4

References

Berde, P; Gerola, M; Hart, J; Higuchi, Y; Kobayashi, M; Koide, T; Lantz, B; O’Connor, B; Radoslavov, P; Snow, W; Parulkar, G. 2014. ‘ONOS: Towards an Open, Distributed SDN’. Proceedings of HotSDN’14. August; Chicago, USA.

Feamster, N; Rexford, J; Zegura, E. 2013. ‘The Road to SDN: An Intellectual History of Programmable Networks’. ACM Queue, Technical Report, New York, USA.

Goransson, P; Black, C. 2014. Software Defined Networks - A Comprehensive Approach. Morgan Kaufmann.

Greenberg, A; Hjalmtysson, G: Maltz, D; Myers, A; Rexford, J; Xie, G; Yan, H; Zhen, J; Zhang,H. 2005. ‘A clean slate 4D approach to network control and management’. Computer Communication Review, Volume 35, Issue 5, 41–54.

Gude, N; Koponen, T; Pettit, J; Pfaff, B; Casado, M; Mckeown, N; Shenker, S. 2008. ‘NOX: Towards an operating system for networks’. Computer Communication Review, Volume 38, Issue 3, 105–110

Holzle, U. 2012. OpenFlow@Google. Google, Open Networking Summits ONS 2012, Santa Clara, USA , April 2012.

Janz, C. 2015. ‘Intent NBI – Definition and Principles’. Open Networking Foundation, Version V2, July 2015.

Kim, H; Feamster, N. 2013. ‘Improving Network Management with Software Defined Networking’. IEEE Communications Magazine: 114-119.

Leon-Garcia, A; Bannazadeh, H; Zhang, Q. 2015. ‘OpenFlow and SDN for Clouds’. Cloud Services, Networking, and Management, Chap. 6. Editors: da Fonseca N; R. Boutaba R. IEEE Press.

Open Networking Foundation White Paper. 2012. ‘Software-De?ned Networking: The New Norm for Networks’. Palo Alto, USA.

Open Networking Foundation. 2013. ‘OpenFlow Switch Specification’. Version 1.4.0

Open Data Center Alliance. 2013, ‘Master Usage Model: Software-Defined Networking’. Rev. 2.0.