E-Government Services and the Digital Divide A Quantitative Analysis of the Digital Divide between the General Public and Internet Users

Main Article Content

Jirina Boksova https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1261-5603
Michal Boksa
Josef Horak https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6672-850X
Karel Pavlica https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0341-8504
Jiri Strouhal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9109-7087
Stanislav Saroch https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1248-9184


E-Government, Digitalization, Internet users, Survey, the Czech Republic


The purpose of this article is to assess the digital divide that exists between the general public and (active) Internet users in their support for the digitalization of public services (E-Government). In conducting this study, the SKODA AUTO University Research Team gathered data from 1,613 respondents – 611 respondents who are active Internet users (using computer-assisted web interviews) and 1,002 respondents from the general public (using pen-and-paper or computer-assisted personal interviews). Results have indicated that the divide exists, although it does not pose as considerable a challenge to the current E-Governance as is often assumed. Based on the current divide, improved ICT skills and higher Internet usage among citizens could increase overall support for the digitalization of public services by up to 20 percentage points. Data results also identified two societal segments, namely, respondents from 1) the age category 60+ years and 2) ‘Below-average income’ respondents, as particularly vulnerable and marginalized.


Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 350 | 301-PDF-v9n1pp27-49 Downloads 35


Accenture. (2019). Nearly One-Third of Citizens Unaware of Digital Government Services, Accenture Survey Finds. Released online 09 July 2019. Accessed 15 May 2020. Available from https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/nearly-one-third-of-citizens-unaware-of-digital-government-services-accenture-survey-finds.htm
Alshehri, M., & Drew, S. (2011). E-government principles: implementation, advantages and challenges. International Journal of Electronic Business 9(3), 255-270. Available from https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/bitstream/handle/10072/42703/73445_1.pdf?sequence=1
Axelsson, K., & Melin, U. (2008). Citizen Participation and Involvement in eGovernment Projects: An Emergent Framework. Proceedings of 7th International Conference EGOV 2008. August 31–September 05, Turin, Italy. Available from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220266346_Citizen_Participation_and_Involvement_in_eGovernment_Projects_An_Emergent_Framework
Axelsson, K., Melin, U., & Lindgren, I. (2010). Exploring the importance of citizen participation and involvement in e?government projects: Practice, incentives, and organization. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 4(4), 299-321. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161011081309
Becker, J., Niehaves, B., Bergener, P., & Räckers, M. (2008). Digital Divide in eGovernment: The eInclusion Gap Model. Proceedings of International Conference on Electronic Government, 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85204-9_20
Boksa, M., Boksova, J., Horak, J., Pavlica, K., Strouhal, J., & Saroch, S. (2019). Digitalni Cesko v digitalin Evrope, Mlada Boleslav, SKODA AUTO VYSOKA SKOLA. Available at https://az749841.vo.msecnd.net/sitescssavs/alv1/24cfb734-6e18-4a45-80ae-9f240bb44b15/Digitalni_Cesko_FINAL%20ONLINE%20VERSION.47e7a82c5a032c9a6521b27138f4dc85.pdf
Brandtzæg, P., Heim, J., & Karahasanovic, A. (2011). Understanding the new digital divide—A typology of Internet users in Europe. International Journal Human-Computer Studies, 69, 123-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.11.004
Carter, L., & Belanger, F. (2004). Citizen Adoption of Electronic Government Initiatives. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221182224_Citizen_Adoption_of_Electronic_Government_Initiatives
Carter, L., Weerakkody, V., Phillips, B., & Dwivedi, Y. (2016). Citizen Adoption of E-Government Services: Exploring Citizen Perceptions of Online Services in the US and UK. Information Systems Management Journal, 33(2). Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295871477_Citizen_Adoption_of_E-Government_Services_Exploring_Citizen_Perceptions_of_Online_Services_in_the_US_and_UK
Chan, F., Thong, J., Venkatesh, V., Brown, S., Hu, P., & Tam, K. (2010). Modeling Citizen Satisfaction with Mandatory Adoption of an E-Government Technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(10), 519-549. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=1976951
Choudrie, J., & Dwivedi, Y. (2005). A Survey of Citizens’ Awareness and Adoption of E-Government Initiatives, The ‘Government Gateway’: A United Kingdom Perspective. Proceedings of the eGovernment Workshop 2005. Available at https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4f8d/16bab6f1c0f5edc6a6fcc026ca5643227551.pdf
Davies, R. (2015). eGovernment Using technology to improve public services and democratic participation. European Parliamentary Research Service. Available at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2015/565890/EPRS_IDA(2015)565890_EN.pdf
Denvir, C., Balmer, N., & Pleasence, P. (2012). Portal or Pot Hole? Exploring How Older People Use the ‘Information Superhighway’ for Advice Relating to Problems with a Legal Dimension. Ageing & Society, 34(4), 670-699. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X12001213
Deursen, A., Helsper, E., & Eynon, R. (2014). Measuring Digital skills From Digital Skills to Tangible Outcomes project report. Oxford Internet Institute. Available at https://www.lse.ac.uk/media-and-communications/assets/documents/research/projects/disto/Measuring-Digital-Skills.pdf
Dodel, M., & Aquirre, F. (2018). Digital inequalities' impact on progressive stages of e-government development’ Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. Available at https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3209415.3209475
European Commission. (2019a). The Digital Economy and Society Index. Accessed 15 February 2020. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/desi
European Commission. (2019b). Czech Republic, country report. Accessed 15 February 2020. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/scoreboard/czech-republic
European Commission. (2020). Czech Republic, country report. Accessed 26 February 2020. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=66910
Elder-Vass, D. (2016). Profit and Gift in the Digital Economy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Fuglerud, K. (2009). ICT Services for Every Citizen: The Challenge of Gaps in User Knowledge. Proceedings of Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction Addressing Diversity. Available at https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-02707-9_5
Gluckman, P. (2018). The Digital Economy and Society A Preliminarily Commentary. Policy Quarterly, 14(1). Accessed at https://ojs.victoria.ac.nz/pq/article/view/4763/4231
Hanafizadeh, M., Hanafizadeh, P., & Bohlin, E. (2013). Digital Divide and e-Readiness: Trends and Gaps. International Journal of E-Adoption, 5(3). Available at https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.4018/ijea.2013070103
Hanafizadeh, M., Hanafizadeh, P., & Saghaei, A. (2009). The Pros and Cons of Digital Divide and E-Readiness Assessments. International Journal of E-Adoption, 1(3). Available at: https://www.igi-global.com/article/pros-cons-digital-divide-readiness/37576
Hanafizadeh, P., Hanafizadeh, M., & Khodabakhshi, M. (2009). Taxonomy of e-Readiness Assessment Measures. International Journal of Information Management, 29(3), 189-195. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236155058_Taxonomy_of_e-Readiness_Assessment_Measures
Hardill, I., & O’Sullivan, R. (2018). E-government: Accessing public services online: Implications for citizenship. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 33(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094217753090
Holzer, M., & Manoharan, A. (2012). Active Citizen Participation in E-Government: A Global Perspective. Hershey, IGI Global. https://doi.org/ 10.4018/978-1-4666-0116-1
ITU. (2004). How to measure the digital divide?. Korean Agency for Digital Opportunity and Promotion. Available at https://www.itu.int/osg/spu/ni/digitalbridges/presentations/02-Cho-Background.pdf
Kunstelj, M., Jukic, T., & Vintar, M. (2007). Analysing the Demand Side of E-Government: What Can We Learn From Slovenian Users?. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Government 2007. Available at https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-74444-3_26
Mofleh, S., & Wanous, M. (2008). Understanding factors influencing citizens’ adoption of e-government services in the developing world: Jordan. INFOCOM-Journal of Computer Science, 7(2), 1-11. Available at http://infocomp.dcc.ufla.br/index.php/INFOCOMP/article/view/211
Nam, T., & Sayogo, D. (2011). Who uses e-government? Examining the digital divide in e-government use. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221547762_Who_uses_e-government_Examining_the_digital_divide_in_e-government_use
Phang, C., Li, Y., Sutanto, J., & Kankanhalli, A. (2005). Senior Citizens' Adoption of E-Government: In Quest of the Antecedents of Perceived Usefulness. Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221180966_Senior_Citizens%27_Adoption_of_E-Government_In_Quest_of_the_Antecedents_of_Perceived_Usefulness
Rokhman, A. (2011). E-Government Adoption in Developing Countries; the Case of Indonesia. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Science, 2(5). Available at http://www.cisjournal.org/archive/vol2no5/vol2no5_4.pdf
Stoiciu, A. (2011). The Role of e-Governance in Bridging the Digital Divide’. UN Chronicle XLVIII, 3. Available at https://unchronicle.un.org/article/role-e-governance-bridging-digital-divide
Veiga, L., & Rohman, K. (2017). e-Government and the Shadow Economy: Evidence from Across the Globe. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Government, 105-116. Available at https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-64677-0_9
Wangpipatwong, S., Chutimaskul, W., & Papasraton, B. (2008). Understanding Citizen’s Continuance Intention to Use e-Government Website: A Composite View of Technology Acceptance Model and Computer Self-efficacy. The Electronic Journal of e-Government, 6(1), 55-64. Available at https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejeg/article/view/484
Weerakkody, V., & Choudrie, J. (2005). Exploring E-Government in the UK: Challenges, Issues and Complexities. Journal of Information Science and Technology, 2(2), 22-45. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239919201_Exploring_E-Government_in_the_UK_Challenges_Issues_and_Complexities