Electronic Communication of Entrepreneurs during the Covid-19 Pandemic in the Czech Republic

Main Article Content

Sárka Sobotovičová https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9665-2043
Beáta Blechová https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3629-4066
Tomáš Pražák https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4119-8530


Electronic communication., Government administration institutions, Covid-19 pandemic., Entrepreneurs, Factors influecing satisfaction


The aim of this article is to find out the attitudes of business entities towards the helpfulness and frequency of the use of electronic communication with government administration institutions in the Czech Republic during the Covid-19 pandemic. The research was conducted in the form of a questionnaire survey of 464 respondents. Based on the primary research, the change in the use of electronic communication was verified. The most important factors influencing satisfaction in communication are functionality, speed and delivery confirmation. The increased need for electronic communication was found especially in micro and small enterprises and in the services sector.



Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 61 | 599-PDF-v11n1pp91-106 Downloads 6


Act No. 12/2020 Collection of Laws, on the Right to Digital Services, https://www.sagit.cz/info/sb20012 (accessed 2021, June 21).
Crivelli, E. (2019). A basic tool to assess tax administration strength in emerging Europe. Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, 27, 425–446.
European Commission. (2013). Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2013:182:0019:0076:EN:PDF (accessed 2021, May 12).
European Commission. (2003). Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - The Role of eGovernment for Europe’s Future. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2003:0567:FIN:EN:PDF (accessed 2020, April 13).
European Commission. (2016). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions EU eGovernment Action Plan 2016-2020 Accelerating the digital transformation of government. COM/2016/0179 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52016DC0179 (accessed 2020, April 13).
European Commission. (2021). Digital Public Services (DESI), Shaping Europe’s digital future. Digital Economy and Society Index Report 2020 - Digital Public Services https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi-digital-public-services (accessed 2021, May 12).
Grant, G., & Chau, D. (2005). Developing a Generic Framework for E-Government. Journal of Global Information Management, 13(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2005010101
Jørgensen, R. F. (2021). Data and rights in the digital welfare state: the case of Denmark. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1934069
Krøtel, S. M. L. (2021). Digital Communication of Public Service Information and its Effect on Citizens’ Perception of Received Information. International Journal of Public Administration, 44, 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1672182
Manoharan, A. P., & McQuiston, J. (2018). Innovative Perspectives on Public Administration in the Digital Age. Boston, University of Massachusetts.
Marciniak, T., Novak, J., Pastusiak, B., & Purta, M. (2020, October 13). Digital Challengers in the next normal in Central and Eastern Europe. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/digital-challengers-in-the-next-normal-in-central-and-eastern-europe (accessed 2021, January 11).
Mates, P., & Smejkal, V. (2012). E-government v České republice. Prague, Leges.
Mohit, S. (2020, May 22). COVID-19 pandemic has spurred government digitalisation, 2020. https://opengovasia.com/covid-19-pandemic-has-spurred-government-digitalisation/ (accessed 2020, June 12).
Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky [Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic]. (2016). Strategic Framework of the Development of Public Administration in the Czech Republic for 2014-2020. https://www.mvcr.cz/clanek/strategicky-ramec-rozvoje.aspx (accessed 2020, February 12).
OECD. (2003). The e-Government Imperative. OECD e-Government Studies, Paris, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264101197-en
Savić, G., Dragojlović, A., Vujošević, M., Arsić, M., & Martić, M. (2015). Impact of the efficiency of the tax administration on tax evasion, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 28(1), 1138–1148. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2015.1100838
Silaškova, J., & Takahashi, M. (2020, July 01). Estonia built one of the world’s most advanced digital societies. During COVID-19, that became a lifeline. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/07/estonia-advanced-digital-society-here-s-how-that-helped-it-during-covid-19/ (accessed 2020, September 31).
Statista Research Department. (2022). https://www.statista.com/topics/2420/e-government/#dossierKeyfigures (accessed 2022, October 22).
Strouhal, J. (2019). Regulace e-Governmentu v Evropské unii. In M. Bokša (Ed.), Digitální Česko v digitální Evropě (pp. 97–117). Mladá Boleslav, ŠKODA AUTO vysoká škola o.p.s.
Veber, J. (2018). Digitalizace ekonomiky a společnosti. Prague, Management Press.